State v. Howard

Decided February 12, 1910

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1910-02-12

<p>BILL OF EXCEPTIONS: Not Identified. Where the bill of exceptions set out in the transcript is not properly identified or authenticated, it cannot be considered on appeal; and a judgment of conviction will be affirm.ed, if no error appears in the record proper.</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1910-02-12

BURGESS, J.

¶1The defendant appeals from a( judgment of the circuit court of Douglas county, Missouri, convicting him of the crime of embezzlement.

¶2The transcript filed in this case contains what purports to be a bill of exceptions, but which is not properly identified or authenticated, and cannot therefore be considered. No error appearing in the record proper, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

All concur.