Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

225 N.C. 773

36 S.E.2d 260

State v. . Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1945

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1945-12-12

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1973

2 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1945-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 The only exceptive assignment of error is directed to alleged error in the charge. The defendant insists the court, in reviewing the contentions of the State, used language which tended to discredit witnesses for the defendant and, in effect, constituted an expression of opinion.

¶2 We are not persuaded the contention as stated by the court is not reasonably supported by the facts and circumstances appearing on this record. In any event it did not constitute an intimation of the opinion of the court or otherwise impinge upon the provisions of Gf. S., 1-180. Hence the assignment of error is without substantial merit.

¶3 No error.

/225/nc/773 · .json · Public domain