Finney v. Finney’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on White v. White · North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Helderman · 171 N.C. App. 550 - Cunningham v. Cunningham · 148 N.C. App. 329 - Fountain v. Fountain · 165 N.C. App. 859 - Oakley v. Oakley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless it affirmatively appears that the owner does not know the market value of his property, it is generally held that he is competent to testify as to its value.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[L]ay opinions as to the value of the property are admissible if the witness can show that he has knowledge of the property and some basis for his opinion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“), which the parties stipulated was marital property, was not supported by the evidence presented. Specifically, Husband asserts there was no competent evidence to support the trial court's finding that the fair market value of the Fairway Drive property as of the date of separation was $45,000.00. We agree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.