Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 NCAPP 390 - Pender v. Lambert

Pender v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Forbis v. Neal · In Re the Will of Jones · Woodson v. Rowland · Pleasant v. Johnson · Bryant v. Dougherty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ngaging in willful, wanton, and reckless behavior is akin to the commission of an intentional tort, and, as such, the employee must form the constructive intent to injure. Such intent exists where conduct threatens the safety of others and is so reckless or manifestly indifferent to the consequences that a finding of willfulness and wantonness equivalent in spirit to actual intent is justified. Alternatively, when an employee is injured by the ordinary negligence of a co-employee, the Act is the exclusive remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.