State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Rogers · State v. Hannah · 152 N.C. App. 564 - State v. Lippard · 200 N.C. App. 74 - State v. Horton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because we have determined that the procedure was not impermissibly suggestive, our due process analysis ends here. Therefore, we need not determine, under the second step in the due process review, whether the procedure created a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the totality of the circumstances reveals a pretrial procedure so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identity as to offend fundamental standards of decency and justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“pertinent aspects of the array, such as similarity of appearance of those in the array and any attribute of the array tending to focus the witness' attention on any particular person therein,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.