Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 NW2D 156 - State v. Hines

State v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
4
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 1999 · most notably State v. Frazier (1984), 96 Wis. 2d 25 - State v. Eisch (1980)

33 state decisions

230197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Dickey v. Florida · State v. Alvarez · State v. Jennings · State v. Gorham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a defendant indicted for a public offense, whose trial has not been postponed upon his application, be not brought to trial within sixty days after the indictment is found, the court must order it to be dismissed, unless good cause to the contrary be shown.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The discretion to avoid dismissal in a criminal case is limited to the exceptional circumstance where the State carries its burden of showing good cause for the delay. This is the circumscribed discretion in review on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Non-chronic ‘court congestion,’ arising out of unique, non-recurring events and resulting in only a short delay may constitute ‘good cause’ satisfying the § 795.2 exception. See State v. Jennings, 195 N.W.2d 351, 356 (Iowa 1972); State v. Alvarez, 189 Neb. 281 , 202 N.W.2d 604 (1972); ABA Standards, Speedy Trial, Approved Draft § 2.3(b), pp. 27-28. * * * ?t”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.