Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 N.W.2d 310 - State v. Jurgenson

State v. Jurgenson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Midgett v. Slayton · United States v. Ponder · State v. Niccum · State v. Mattingly · State v. Stodola

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Admission of evidence is not prejudicial where substantially the same evidence is in the record without objection,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.