Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 PASUPER 345 - Commonwealth v. Kulp

Commonwealth v. Kulp’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
7
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 1994 · most notably 227 Pa. Super. 527 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Colcough v. Aytch (1974), 261 Pa. Super. 274 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coleman v. Cuyler (1978)

32 state decisions

240197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Whiting · United States Ex Rel. Anthony Vitiello v. Walter J. Flood, Warden of the Nassau County Jail · Luker v. Koch · Commonwealth v. Glavin · Commonwealth ex rel. Dronsfield v. Hohn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “*** Courts in asylum states will not consider issues which are best raised at trial. ***”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Competent evidence to establish reasonable ground is not necessarily evidence sufficient to convict, nor only such as can pass technical rules governing the admissibility of evidence in criminal trials.” U. S. v. Flood, 374 F.2d 554, 557 (2d Cir. 1967).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Given the summary nature of interstate rendition proceedings, an accused is not entitled to receive the full panoply of procedural protections normally accorded to a defendant in a criminal trial. ***”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.