225 So. 3d 512 - Rodock v. Pommier’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 907 So. 2d 37 - Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish Government · 817 So. 2d 69 - Campbell v. Melton · 809 So. 2d 1040 - SOUTHERN CASING OF LA., INC. v. Houma Avionics, Inc. · 591 So. 2d 741 - Earles v. Ahlstedt · 601 So. 2d 1374 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he decision whether to grant relief against a recalcitrant party rests within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Camalo v. Estrada
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.