State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Kontrick v. Ryan · Eberhart v. United States · Marin v. State · Zillender v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) To file. The defendant may file a motion for new trial before, but no later than 30 days after, the date when the trial court imposes or suspends sentence in open court. (b) To amend. Within 30 days after the date when the trial court imposes or suspends sentence in open court but before the court overrules any preceding motion for new trial, a defendant may, without leave of court, file one or more amended motions for new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cueva v. State“as opponent of a tardy amendment to a motion for new trial, can forfeit its otherwise-peremptory right by inaction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clarke v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.