Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 U.S. 392 - Brown v. C. T. Elliott

Brown v. C. T. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis

225 U.S. 392 · 1911

Citation profile

366
cited by 366 later decisions
35
cited 35 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

204 federal appellate · 41 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 366 later decisions (35 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016 · most notably Dennis v. United States (1966), United States v. Borden Co. (1939)

204 federal appellate · 41 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 12 states

74019111920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hyde v. United States · United States v. Kissel · Hyde v. United States · Hyde v. Shine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 366 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As the place of the overt act may be the place of jurisdiction, it follows that the exact place where the conspiracy was formed need not be alleged.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he period of limitation must be computed from the date of the overt act rather than the formation of the conspiracy . . . . [and] must be computed from the date of the last of them of which there is an appropriate allegation and proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““But it is alleged that the place where the conspiracy was formed is unknown, no place is laid for its continuance, and the petitioners are not shown to have been engaged in it in Omaha or ever to have been in the place.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.