Rosecky v. Tomaszewski’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““We are of opinion that the denial of interest on the $800 from the time of the tender to the time of trial was erroneous. The statute, or court rule of the same effect as a statute, sec. 331.171 (1), Stats., requires that the debtor pay the amount of the tender into court before commencement of the trial and notify the opposite party in writing, or be deprived of all benefit of such tender. The deposit was not made. The respondents therefore acquired no benefit from their tender, assuming that it was properly made, and assuming that they kept it good by at all times having the money at hand to pay it over to the appellant. Two decisions of this court, Breitenbach v. Turner, 18 Wis. , and Mankel v. Belscamper, 84 Wis. 218 , 54 N. W. 500 , are cited to the effect that payment into court is not necessary in equity cases, but Weigell v. Gregg, 161 Wis. 413 , 154 N. W. 645 , is directly to the contrary.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Stiles v. Dahlke

2. “the act of an authorized agent is the act of the principal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Smith v. RecordQuest, LLC