225 Wis. 2d 159 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “911 System Wins Big in County Referendum, Milwaukee Journal, Nov. 5, 1986, at 3B. ¶ 69. Today, an enhanced system normally provides authorities with (1) the telephone number of the telephone from which an incoming call is made, (2) the address of the residence or place of business where an incoming call is made, and (3) the name of the person or place of business to whom the telephone in question is registered. The third feature is equivalent to”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Williams

2. “OPERATOR: Disrestrict (sic) until further notice. OPERATOR2: 73R. SQUAD 73R 73R. OPERATOR2: 73R drug dealing complaint, 4261 North Teutonia and the alley. Somebody's dealing drugs from a blue and burgundy Ford Bronco that's parked in the driveway on the side of the building. Complaint number is 1119. SQUAD 73R: 10-4.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Williams

3. “By nearly 8 to 1, voters said in a referendum that they wanted [Milwaukee] County to establish a 911 system, which automatically records a caller's telephone number and address at a central dispatch location, even if the caller cannot speak.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Williams