225 Wis. 2d 248 - State v. Eesley’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

22 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “encouraging] the expeditious and orderly disposition of such [outstanding] charges [against a prisoner] and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Tarrant · State v. Miller

2. “(4) Article IV. (a) The appropriate officer of the jurisdiction in which an untried indictment, information or complaint is pending shall be entitled to have a prisoner against whom the officer has lodged a detainer and who is serving a term of imprisonment in any party state made available ... upon presentation of a written request for temporary custody or availability to the appropriate authorities of the state in which the prisoner is incarcerated....”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Nonahal · 302 F. Supp. 2d 374 - Buhl v. Lappin

3. “on the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against the prisoner, the prisoner shall be brought to trial within 180 days after the prisoner has ... delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court... notice of the place of his or her imprisonment and his or her request for a final disposition to be made of the ... complaint....”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Miller · 298 Wis. 2d 702 - State ex rel. Pharm v. Bartow