Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 W. Va. 736 - State v. Dellinger

225 W. Va. 736 - State v. Dellinger’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McMullan v. National Bank of Commerce · Dyer v. Calderon · 192 W. Va. 165 - State v. Derr · 197 W. Va. 588 - State v. Miller · 207 W. Va. 640 - State v. Vance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing challenges to findings and rulings made by a circuit court, we apply a two-pronged deferential standard of review. We review the rulings of the circuit court concerning a new trial and its conclusion as to the existence of reversible error under an abuse of discretion standard, and we review the circuit court's underlying factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard. Questions of law are subject to a de novo review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.