Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 225 W. Va. 753 - State v. Fields

225 W. Va. 753 - State v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Arizona v. Fulminante · Sullivan v. Louisiana · United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez · 182 W. Va. 302 - Matter of Jonathan P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he authority of a trial court in a criminal case to remove a court-appointed attorney on the court’s own motion, over the objection of the defendant and the attorney, is severely limited and must be supported by specific findings and conclusions placed on the record. The removal of a court appointed attorney shall be subject to an abuse of discretion standard upon review by this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]o safeguard the integrity of its proceedings and to insure the proper administration of justice, a circuit court has inherent authority to conduct and control matters before it in a fair and orderly fashion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.