¶1Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court committed error in ruling upon the evidence at foUos 109, 122, 163. One ruHng (Fol. 109) resulted in injecting into the case irrelevant prejudicial matter which aggravated the effect of counsel’s statements of Hke character in the opening (Fol. 35). Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, CarsweU and Scudder, JJ., concur.
226 A.D. 744
Dube v. Dube
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1929
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1929-04-15
Decided 1929-04-15