State v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 district · 107 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably State v. Miller (1993), State v. Clark (2001)
4 district · 107 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a magistrate has determined that the warrant affidavit presents sufficient objective indicia of reliability to justify a search and has issued a warrant, a court reviewing that warrant at a subsequent suppression hearing should defer to the reasonable inferences drawn by the magistrate . . .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“. . . [A] reviewing court must uphold the validity of the warrant . . . if the affidavit at issue presented a substantial factual basis [including the inferences reasonably drawn from the affidavit for the magistrate's conclusion that probable cause existed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“. . .the substantial basis test means that the reviewing court must give deference to . . . must take as a given. . .all reasonable inferences drawn by the issuing judge, and then decide whether, based upon the facts explicitly stated in the affidavit, supplemented by those reasonable inferences, the affidavit establishes probable cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.