Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

226 Conn. 910

State v. Busque

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 17, 1993

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1993-06-17

Relies on State v. Busque

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-06-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction (1995), Beasley v. Commissioner of Correction (1997)

37 state decisions

170199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 120 (AC 9727), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude:
“1. In reviewing a nonconstitutional claim, that evidence was more prejudicial than probative, when the claim was unpreserved?
“2. In ignoring the trial court’s narrow ruling on admissibility, and instead examining the details of testimony admitted after the ruling, in deciding whether the court abused its discretion in admitting such evidence as was relevant to the limited purpose?
“3. In finding the limited use of the evidence harmful, when the jury was already well aware of the defendant’s misconduct?”
*911The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14794.James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.Susan M. Hankins, assistant public defender, in opposition.Decided June 17, 1993
/226/conn/910 · .json · Public domain