Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 F.1d 148 - Stokes v. Williams

Stokes v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

226 F. 148 · 1915

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably A. O. Smith Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1282. Inland Steel Company v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1283. Northwest Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1284. Oscar Mayer & Co. Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1285. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1286. Hobart Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1287. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1288. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1289 (1976), United States v. Price (1982)

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

8019151920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kimberly v. Arms · Quinby v. Conlan · Basey v. Gallagher · Blossom v. The Milwaukee Railroad Company · First Nat. Bank of Cleveland v. Shedd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly established, or an obvious error has ocurred in the application of the law, or a serious and important mistake has been made in the consideration of the proof, the judgment of the trial court must be taken as presumptively correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.