Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

226 F.2d 176

Docket No. 7045.

Rodgers v. O'reilly

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued October 6, 1955.

Decided October 7, 1955.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-10-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1955

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1955-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John Grimball, Columbia, S. C. (William P. Donelan, Columbia, S. C., J. B. Browder and Leaman & Browder, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Walter J. Bristow, Jr., Columbia, S. C. (T. Eston Marchant, Jr., Columbia, S. C., and John P. Moore, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an automobile collision case. The only questions presented by the appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence; but when this is considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as it must be for the purposes of the appeal, we think that it was unquestionably sufficient. The questions involved are pure questions of fact; and we cannot say that reasonable men could not have differed as to the conclusions to be drawn from the evidence with regard thereto.

¶2

Affirmed.

/226/f2d/176 · .json · Public domain