Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 F.2d 331 - Davis v. United States

Davis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

226 F.2d 331 · 1955

Citation profile

170
cited by 170 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

109 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 170 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2020 · most notably Cohen v. United States (1962), Truesdell v. Comm'r (1987)

109 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

61019551960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 145

Relies on Helvering v. Horst · Corliss v. Bowers · Rutkin v. United States · Burnet v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant makes . much of the fact that the government has not fixed a label of some kind on the funds that he took from his corporation. It is not necessary to describe them as additional salary, illicit bonuses, or commissions, or anything more than wrongful diversions, since, as above mentioned, substance controls over form, and taxation is concerned with the actual command over the property taxed.””
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[T]he gains to the recipient which are subject to taxation may not only be unlawful gains of a civil nature, but may also be unlawful gains of a criminal nature.””
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'That occurs when cash, as here, is delivered by its owner to the taxpayer in a manner which allows the recipient freedom to dispose of it at will, even though it may have been obtained by fraud and his freedom to use it may be assailable by someone with a better title to it.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.