James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor v. Pascal System, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
226 F.2d 391 · 1955
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1974
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Kirschbaum v. Walling US Arsenal Bldg Corporation · Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Phillips v. Walling US · Roland Electrical Co. v. Walling · Walling v. Consumers Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Was the defendant and the plaintiff, as defendant’s employee, during this period of time engaged in interstate commerce for the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act? (2) Did the defendant’s business and the manner in which it was operated meet the requirements for exemption as provided by § 13 of the Act?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.