United States v. Geevers’s Empirical Analysis
226 F.3d 186 · 2000
Citation profile
34 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably United States v. Youla (2001), Elcock v. Kmart Corp. (2000)
34 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344
Relies on Stinson v. United States · United States v. Kopp · United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · United States v. Watkins · United States v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“District Court could reject this proposition as unlikely.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“if an intended loss that the defendant was attempting to inflict can be determined, this figure will be used if it is greater than the actual loss.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“draw inferences from the face value of ... checks [$2,000,000] in arriving at the factual conclusion that the defendant intended”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.