Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 F.3d 346 - United States v. Davis

United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

226 F.3d 346 · 2000

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
8
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Martinez (2005), United States v. Bieganowski (2002)

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

510200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Neder v. United States · United States v. Gaudin · United States v. Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the aggregate amount withdrawn from an account containing commingled funds exceeds the clean funds, individual withdrawals may be said to be of tainted money, even if a particular withdrawal was less than the amount of clean money in the account.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] district court has broad discretion in framing instructions to the jury, and this Court will not reverse unless the instructions taken as a whole do not correctly reflect the issues and the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Obviously, when tainted money is mingled with untainted money in a bank account, there is no longer any way to distinguish the tainted from the untainted because money is fungible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.