Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 F.3d 367 - Jeffrey Henry Caldwell v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division

Jeffrey Henry Caldwell v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division’s Empirical Analysis

226 F.3d 367 · 2000

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · Teague v. Lane · Ake v. Oklahoma · Ford v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he State has a substantial and legitimate interest in taking petitioner’s life as punishment for his crime.... [T]he only question raised is not whether, but when, his execution may take place. This question is important, but it is not comparable to the antecedent question whether petitioner should be executed at all. It follows that this Court’s decisions imposing heightened procedural requirements on capital trials and sentencing proceedings ... do not apply in this context. 20”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.