Adams County Regional Water District v. Village of Manchester, Ohio’s Empirical Analysis
226 F.3d 513 · 2000
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 7 U.S.C. § 1921 (Agricultural Credit Act of 1978) · 7 U.S.C. § 1926
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Rita v. United States · Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 6 · Wayne v. Village of Sebring · City of Madison v. Bear Creek Water Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) it is an “association” within the meaning of the Act, (2) it is indebted to the Department of Agriculture (formerly Farmers Home Administration, now RE CDS), and (3) it has provided or made service available to the disputed area.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“provision `should be given a liberal interpretation that protects rural water associations indebted to the FmHA from municipal encroachment.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.