James v. England’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any administratively exhausted class claims, which . . . would permit it to entertain a motion for class certification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]econd, that they should be excused for any untimely filings. . . on equitable tolling grounds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“permit them to circumvent the clear legal structure for pursuing class claims under Title VII.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.