Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 FSUPP2D 175 - Cobell v. Norton

Cobell v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

7 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. · Firestone v. K Firestone · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed Martin Corp. · 109 F. Supp. 2d 27 - McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “District courts have broad discretion to grant or deny a motion for reconsideration. The court may invoke its discretion and deny such a motion unless it finds an intervening change in controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.