Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 Ga. App. 861 - Powell v. State

226 Ga. App. 861 - Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2014

7 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 201 Ga. App. 238 - Gregg v. State · Williams v. State · West v. State · 166 Ga. App. 766 - Burns v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Gaskell , unlike this case, defense counsel specifically objected to the degree of force used in the demonstration; the witness said he based his presentation on a demonstration by a police officer whose knowledge was derived from a father in another case; the witness admitted he displayed a greater degree of force than that required to produce shaken baby syndrome; Gaskell had admitted shaking the child, though for.resuscitation purposes, making the issue of the amount of force actually used critical; and, the convic tion was not reversed solely on the demonstration, but also on two other errors in the trial of the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Obviously, a demonstration of how shaken infant syndrome occurs would have to be done with a mannequin or a doll rather than a real infant. Such objects will differ in many respects from a real child. However, any dissimilarity between the conditions of the demonstration and the actual occurrence affects the weight rather than the admissibility of the evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.