Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 ILL 9 - Steinmeyer v. Schroeppel

Steinmeyer v. Schroeppel’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
13
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School District (1960), 37 Cal. 2d 696 - M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los Angeles (1951)

3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions — followed in 13 states

130190719101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bonney v. Stoughton · Harran v. Foley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A mistake which will justify relief in equity must affect the substance of the contract, and not a mere incident or the inducement for entering into it. The mistake of the appellants did not relate to the subject matter of the contract, its location, identity or amount, and there was neither belief in the existence of a fact which did not exist or ignorance of any fact material to the contract which did exist.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If there is apparently a valid contract in writing, but by reason of a mistake of fact by one of the parties, not due [emphasis added] to his negligence, the contract is different with respect to the subject matter or terms from what was intended, equity will give to such party a remedy by cancellation where the parties can be placed in statu quo. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.