State v. Budden’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably State v. Johnson (2000), State v. Johnson (1986)
2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 33 Ill. App. 3d 736 - People v. Guynn · Rogers v. Shanahan · State v. Estes · State v. Bailey · State v. Carroll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““refer exclusively to the operation of vehicles upon highways except: “(a) Where a different place is specifically referred to in a given section; and “(b) The provisions of K.S.A. 8-1566 to 8-1568, inclusive, and the provisions of article 10 of chapter 8 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, and any acts amendatory thereof, shall apply upon highways and elsewhere throughout the state.” (Emphasis added.) K.S.A. 8-1501”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Where a different place is specifically referred to in a given section. (2) The provisions of IC 9-4-1-40 through IC 9—4-1-56 [9—4-1-40 through 9-4-1-54] shall apply upon highways and elsewhere throughout the state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Carter““[T]he statement of the elements of the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor found in State v. Hall, 1 Kan. App. 2d 730 , Syl. ¶ 1, is approved.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.