Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 Md. 400 - Smith v. Bernfeld

Smith v. Bernfeld’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

118
cited by 118 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 115 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 118 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc. (1978), Peterson v. Underwood (1970)

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 115 state decisions

3901961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strasburger v. Vogel · Maszczenski v. Myers · Hickory Transfer Co. v. Nezbed · Dunstan v. Bethlehem Steel Co. · Long v. Joestlein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule by which the sufficiency of the evidence is to be tested when this Court is reviewing a motion for a directed verdict or judgment n.o.v. for the defendant is well established as being that this Court must resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of the plaintiff and must assume the truth of all evidence and inferences as may naturally and legitimately be deduced therefrom which tend to support the plaintiff’s right to recover — that is, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'attempt to establish specific grounds of alleged negligence precludes recourse to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.