Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 Mich. 175 - Gluc v. Klein

Gluc v. Klein’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2016

7 state decisions

301924193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stanton v. Hitchcock · Beecher v. Common Council · Black v. Singley · Standard v. Jewell · Ekegren v. Marcotte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the wife’s right to dower during the lifetime of her husband is inchoate, or, as it is sometimes expressed, ‘in expectancy,’ a perfect title to lands owned by him cannot be given without the barring of such right. This she may do by joining in the conveyance with her husband ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Under the statute if the wife resides out of the State her right of dower is barred by a conveyance executed by the husband alone.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.