Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 MO 41 - Woolley v. Mears

Woolley v. Mears’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
May 1974
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1974

15 state decisions

601910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Julow · Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co. · State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co. · Frank L. Fisher Co. v. Woods · State ex rel. Harris v. Herrmann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no good reason which could be assigned why it should not be made applicable to all cities and other portions of the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.