Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 Mont. 94 - Pulliam v. Pulliam

Pulliam v. Pulliam’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bender v. Bender · P & M CATTLE CO. v. Holler · First National Bank of Twin Bridges v. Sant · Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Indemnity Co. · Round v. Reikofski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To establish ... a partnership, it is necessary to determine the intent of the parties: such business relationships arise only when the parties intend to associate themselves as such. There must be some contribution by each co-adventurer or partner or something promotive of the enterprise. There must be joint proprietary interest and a right of mutual control over the subject matter of the enterprise or over the property engaged therein, and there must be an agreement to share the profits. [Citations omitted.] The intention of the parties has to be clearly manifested, [citing cases] and must be ascertained from all the facts and circumstances and actions and conduct of the parties. [Citations omitted.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.