Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 N.C. 379 - Rea v. . Simowitz

Rea v. . Simowitz’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Johnson v. Heath (1954), Lamm v. Lorbacher (1952)

30 state decisions

12019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In explaining legal principles to a lay jury the trial judge’s use of illustrations should be carefully guarded to avoid suggestions susceptible of inferences as to the facts beyond that intended. And this Court has on occasion awarded new trials where illustrations or hypothetical references were deemed to constitute prejudicial error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.