Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 NCAPP 129 - State v. Rollins

State v. Rollins’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Illinois v. Perkins · State v. Cooke · State v. Hennis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hearsay is defined as 'a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.' " State v. Morgan , 359 N.C. 131 , 154, 604 S.E.2d 886 , 900 (2004) (quoting N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 801(c) (2003) ). "Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by statute or by these rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “strictly limited to determining whether the trial judge's underlying findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, in which event they are conclusively binding on appeal, and whether those factual findings in turn support the judge's ultimate conclusions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In addition, this Court may also consider any uncontroverted evidence which was presented at the suppression hearing which would support the trial court's conclusions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.