226 N.J. Super. 441 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2019
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Roth · State v. Maguire · State v. D.R. · State v. La Porte · State v. Balles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the element of age is included within this crime, I don't think it completely blankets it, and I think there * is some consideration given to the seriousness of harm inflicted on someone of this age.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Miller“the conviction itself required that [the] defendant have 'sexual contact with a victim who [was] less than 13 years old,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Miller“[t]he extreme youth of the victim was a proper aggravating factor to have been considered by the [sentencing] court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.