Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

226 So. 2d 855

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 3, 1969

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1969-10-03

Relies on Reddick v. State

Decided 1969-10-03

PER CURIAM.

¶1Defendant questions the denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule One (now Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.) on the ground that the record does not show that the trial court informed him as to the consequences of his guilty plea.

¶2After carefully reviewing the record, in light of the law applicable at the time Johnson entered the guilty plea, we find his argument to be without merit.

¶3Affirmed on the authority of Reddick v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 340.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
/226/so2d/855 · .json · Public domain