Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 SO3D 337 - Packal v. Johnson

Packal v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Touhey v. Seda · Anthony David v. Marlene Schack · 69 So. 3d 403 - Levy v. Jacobs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support an injunction against stalking.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.