Smith v. Cathey’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1972
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aransas County v. Coleman-Fulton Pasture Co. · Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. State · 48 Tex. Civ. App. 16 - City of Texarkana v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. · State v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. · State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to exercise general control and superintendence over all roads, highways, ferries and bridges in their counties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.