Sutherland v. Cotter’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rankin v. Nash-Texas Co. · McCray v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. · Jackson v. McClendon · 59 Tex. Civ. App. 323 - St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. Cason · Heard & Heard, Inc. v. Kuhnert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A person exercising ordinary care in the operation of a car on a public highway does not ordinarily overtake and collide with another vehicle traveling on the proper side of the road and at a reasonable speed. Such an unusual accident, in the very nature of things, suggests negligence. Appellee’s allegations and proof showed more than a mere collision and resulting injury. They showed the character of the accident and such circumstances attending the same as to justify an inference of negligence on the part of appellant.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Denham v. Smith · Knight v. Smith““The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the conditions of the highway.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Erck v. Zelios · Denham v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.