Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 226 Wis. 2d 164 - State v. Agnello

226 Wis. 2d 164 - State v. Agnello’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably 227 Wis. 2d 758 - State v. Erickson (1999), State v. Lawrence (2007)

57 state decisions

3601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Arizona v. Fulminante · Colorado v. Connelly · Lego v. Twomey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here . . . the language of the provision in the state constitution is `virtually identical' to that of the federal provision or where no difference in intent is discernible, Wisconsin courts have normally construed the state constitution consistent with the United States Supreme Court's construction of the federal constitution”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. State v. Jennings · State v. Demone Alexander
  2. “both parties and courts have notice of the disputed issues as well as a fair opportunity to prepare and address them in a way that most efficiently uses judicial resources.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 785 - State v. Schmidt-Sharkey · 227 Wis. 2d 758 - State v. Erickson
  3. “only in cases where either the state constitution or 'the laws of this state require that greater protection of the citizens' liberties ... be afforded.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. State v. Knapp · State v. Jesse J. Delebreau

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.