226 Wis. 2d 349 - State v. Agacki’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 17 Cal. 3d 425 - Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California · 117 Wis. 2d 529 - Ball v. District No. 4, Area Board · 53 Cal. 3d 522 - People v. Wharton · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · Gross v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t would be absurd ... to impose a testimonial privilege to prevent courts from considering the very communication leading to the responsible and lawful conduct of the psychotherapist”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Orr“encouraged patients to candidly discuss health concerns with those treating them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“at all stages of all actions, cases and proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.