Marshall v. Richter

¶1Order and judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that it is undisputed that the plaintiff violated the statute by failing to pass to the right of the center of the intersecting streets, which was one of the proximate causes of the collision and which made him guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. [134 Mise. 56.]