Porter v. Time Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1975
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ellington v. Remmel · Jett v. Crittenden · Commissioner of Labor, C. R. Thornbrough v. Danco Construction Co. · Files v. Tebbs · Haglin v. Atkinson-Williams Hardware Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are not required to explore the one record (transcript) that is presented to us, this duty rests on appellant, and it is further his duty, as indicated, to furnish this court such an abridgement of the record that will enable us to understand the matters presented. This he has not done.’ Ellington v. Remmel, 226 Ark. 569 , 293 S. W. 2d 452 ; Porter v. Times Stores, Inc., 227 Ark. 286 , 298 S. W. 2d 51 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. Overturf“"The appellant's abstract or abridgment of the record should consist of an impartial condensation, without comment or emphasis, of only such material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts, documents, and other matters in the record as are necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to this court for decision."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.