Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 ARK 528 - Turnage v. Matkin

Turnage v. Matkin’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1973
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lupton v. Lupton · City of Little Rock v. Newcomb · Brown v. Ozark Black Marble Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * unless the preponderance of the evidence appears to be against the chancellor’s findings we must affirm.’’ See: Lupton v. Lupton, 210 Ark. 140 , 194 S. W. 2d 686 ; Turnage v. Matkin, 227 Ark. 528 , 299 S. W. 2d 831 . "* * * the judgment of the chancellor on the question of the preponderance of the evidence will he considered as persuasive when the evidence is conflicting, and evenly poised, or nearly so.” City of Little Rock v. Newcomb, supra; Turnage v. Matkin, 227 Ark. 528 , 299 S. W. 2d 831 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.