Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 BR 553 - In Re Wells

In Re Wells’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 102 · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 1109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco · Jacobellis v. Ohio · Baskett v. United States · Toibb v. Radloff · Albany Partners Ltd Albany Partners Ltd v. Wp Westbrook Albany Partners Ltd Wp Westbrook Ww C

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “on which performance is due to some extent on both sides.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.