Sugg v. Eskew

Decided October 4, 1915.

Rehearing Denied December 18, 1915.)

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1915-10-04

Dyer, Judge. Action at law by Clyde F. Sugg and others against John Eskew and the Decatur Egg' Case Company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1945

1 district · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Byrd v. Hall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by Charles Fremont Amidon · Decided 1915-10-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge.

¶2Action at law by Clyde F. Sugg and others against John Eskew and the Decatur Egg' Case Company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4Wilson Cramer, of Jackson, Mo., and R. B. Oliver, Sr., of Cape Girardeau, Mo., for plaintiffs in error.

¶5John T. McKay, of Kennett, Mo., and Charles W. Bates, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants in error.

¶6Before SANBORN and HOOK, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.

¶7AMIDON, District Judge.

¶8This is a companion suit to Bryd v. Hall et al., 227 Fed. 537, -C. C. A.-, in which our opinion has just been filed. For the reasons there set forth the judgment in this case is affirmed.